Re: Temporal Release Strategy
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:12:31AM -0400, Patrick A. Ouellette wrote:
> The progression I see is:
> unstable -> testing -> candidate -> stable
> The existing rules for promotion from unstable to testing continue to be
> Promotion from testing to candidate requires meeting the same rules as
> promotion from unstable to testing with the following exceptions:
> packages must be in testing for at least 3 months, and have no release
> critical bugs.
One big problem testing has are transitions. This includes library
transitions, but also other transitions like e.g. an ocaml transition
affecting several dozen packages currently waiting to enter testing.
Many transitions require a serious amount of manual coordination since
all packages have to be ready to go into testing _at the same time_.
Please explain how you think any bigger transition can ever enter your
"candidate" if you add to the testing criteria a "3 months" criteria all
affected packages have to fulfill at the same time?
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed