Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com> writes:
> Please don't rehash old arguments. Nobody has argued that we should put
> non-free packages into main, but we don't agree on what is free and what
> isn't for all types of packages.
Actually, nobody from the "more lenient" side has given a description
of what they think the right bounds for freeness are for
documentation, and why those bounds should be different than for