Re: How to define a release architecture
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:28:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst (wouter@debian.org) [050322 13:05]:
> > In the general case, as I have said before, I don't think anyone would
> > take offense at a security announcement being sent out containing
> > MD5sums for packages for i386, sparc, powerpc, alpha, ia64 and s390,
> > with a message like 'packages for m68k, mips, mipsel, arm, and hppa will
> > be announced when ready' if the delay would become unacceptable, or so.
>
> I have heared that the current scripts used on security.debian.org do
> not really support this.
Implementing whatever will come out of this will require some extra
coding anyway; it won't hurt to have to add the security.d.o scripts to
the list of 'things that need changes'. Sorry, but that's not a valid
argument.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: