Re: Relaxing testing requirements (was: summarising answers to Vancouver critique)
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:22:31 +0100, martin f krafft
<madduck@debian.org> wrote:
>also sprach martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> [2005.03.18.1021 +0100]:
>> That said, the chance of a package going out of sync on more than
>> a few architectures is minimal, so even though your speculation is
>> correct, it's likely not going to be in effect ever.
>
>and if we have different versions for different arches, the
>differences are most likely minimal, so that security patches should
>apply with minimal additional effort.
It is, however, widely considered a feature that a package has the
same version on all released arches. I'd vouch for keeping that
requirement.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: