On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:14:22PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > The step for you to become trusted is easy: apply for NM. A few years > > ago, I would've happily become your advocate. This /must/ mean you're > > trustworthy, even though you're not trusted yet. After all, trustworthy > > means 'deserving our trust' whereas trusted means 'getting our trust'. > > The two are very different. > > True... for some aspects... > > Either you trust me as a person or you trust some kind of software snippet, > aka gpg key. > To trust a person doesn't require any additional stuff. > And I don't see why you want to trust some kind of bytes on a disk more than > me as a person. Gah, what a load of gibberish. Trust is a 3-ary function of the form: trust :: Person -> Task -> Scenario -> Boolean And is defined as: trust p t s = (need_to_trust p t s) && (willing_to_trust p t s) It is not this, as you so absurdly claim: trust p t s = willing_to_trust p -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature