Re: status of buildds?

To: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: status of buildds?
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 16 Mar 2005 09:58:34 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vf7rv5f9.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87y8codlfk.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <[🔎] 87sm2xjz7n.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20050315064455.GS6416@2004.bluespice.org> <[🔎] 871xahjtas.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 874qfdfdqf.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 87d5u0g7o4.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 87y8codlfk.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

> > So do it on machines that *are* hosted by DDs.  Geez.
> 
> Still not debian admin approved.

The Developer's Reference contains the procedures for binary NMUs.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: status of buildds?
  - From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>

References:
- status of buildds?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: status of buildds?
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2005.bluespice.org>
- Re: status of buildds?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: status of buildds?
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: status of buildds?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: status of buildds?
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Another load of typos
Next by Date: Re: status of buildds?
Previous by thread: Re: status of buildds?
Next by thread: Re: status of buildds?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread