Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

[Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>]

Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
>DSA can still admin the one or two systems per arch which need stricter
>checks -- for instance, those which are used by developers to test-build
>packages. But I don't think they need to personally admin every builder
>that's sitting behind a firewall, has no outside logins, and doesn't do
>much besides building packages.
>
>That'd reduce DSA's work load, not sacrifice security, and still afford
>some level of build activity even if the other system admins don't react
>immediately.

Yes, sounds like a good plan.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
There's no sensation to compare with this
Suspended animation, A state of bliss