Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> AFAICS creating a "proposed-updates"-like tree called "snapshot-s390"
> for preparing a snapshot would be straightforward, if it would be
> useful; and the snapshotting feature already discussed counts somewhat
> as infrastructure support.
One suggestion here then is for the final form of this to indicate a
willingness on the part of archive administrators to help non-released
archs with such archives. (Of course, where lots of coding is needed,
you can't be expected to promise that; I'm speaking more of set-up and
infrastructure support.)
Thomas
Reply to: