Re: s390 not currently projected releasable
Scripsit Thiemo Seufer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>> If a DD has a machine with cpu cycles to spend on an architecture
>> that's lagging behind, what's to stop them from just beginning to
>> build packages and upload them?
> It needs e.g. to take P-a-s into account, for example.
What is a P-a-s?
>> For real cleverness one could try to second-guess the wanna-build
>> ordering (UTSL!) and build from the other end of the list. Then cycles
>> would only be wasted when the queue is nearly empty anyway.
> Not that clever. The list is ordered for a reason.
Is this reason strong enough to say that building from back end will
not help reduce the backlog?
Henning Makholm "... popping pussies into pies
Wouldn't do in my shop
just the thought of it's enough to make you sick
and I'm telling you them pussy cats is quick ..."