On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:38:29PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > And keeping IA64 in the loop is just another joke from the release > team. It'd be interesting to find out, but I bet more m68ks were sold > than IA64 last year. Which of these two architectures are you more likely to be able to run a current 2.6 kernel on, BTW? You do know that m68k is the only architecture still carrying around 2.*2* kernels in sarge? The inclusion of ia64 in the release count is a projection, based on where I believe things are today. Nothing the release team is doing ensures that ia64 is going to be a viable port, a year from now when we're trying to release etch; and nothing says that one or more of the other ports won't be in a position to meet those criteria and get added to the release list. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature