Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net> wrote:
>> That's very Ubuntu-centric. What about the others ? I'm not
>> specifically speaking of Ubuntu here. You can add Project Scud to the
>> list, if you'd like.
>
> Got a more specific example or are you just going to keep throwing conspiracy
> theories around?
Throwing around, there's something going on behind the scene that
needs to be found and revealed.
>> At least back then we weren't trying to reduce the set of
>> architectures we support to match theirs.
>
> This isn't about matching with Debian-derivatives. This is about the load
> placed on the people doing the actual work. Are you paying attention to what
> the Release Managers, D-I Lead, and FTP Masters are saying? Or are you just
> assuming that they're out to get you?
Yes, I do pay attention. I also pay attention when some of them tell
us they don't want help.
>> And keeping IA64 in the loop is just another joke from the release
>> team. It'd be interesting to find out, but I bet more m68ks were sold
>> than IA64 last year.
>
> Oh no! Objective criteria! Whatever shall we do?
Hide them as fast as we can, what else ?
JB.
- --
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org>
Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCNiCezWFP1/XWUWkRAmHnAJwLm1EWLHCumQnjKTRsCHnBxg5ujQCeInaI
mYyeMhr0sOkosH8D4LiJi1c=
=WlLn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: