Re: Sarge release (Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yes, but the utherly arrogant and despreciating way in how this announcement
Chill out. It was a RFC, and it was labelled as such. It may not be perfect,
and obviously it will see some (many?) changes yet. But it was NOT arrogant
or depreciating.
Some of it could have used a lot more thought (the need for a tier-1.5 where
there is full support but a reduced mirror set is *obvious* in hindsight
IMHO), but that's the idea behind requesting comments.
> No data on what exactly the problems where, no data on the correlation of
> those problems on the proposed drastic solutions, no minutes of the meeting,
> no previous announcement to involve the porters, nothing.
Since it is a RFC, that is not needed, as we ARE obviously going over all
that anyway, and trying to do it beforehand *is* an utterly useless effort
the way Debian mailinglist threads usually work.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: