Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

[Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>]

Hi, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> It's not clear that an FTP site really satisfies that, and it's also the
> case that this is the FSF's interpretation rather than being the one
> that all GPL copyright holders hold. I'd worry that we might fall foul
> of some (seemingly valid) GPL interpretations.

Then we convince that person that they're wrong, convince them to
allow us to do it anyway, or remove that package. It's happened
before, when somebody interpreted the MIT license in a way nobody
else does. :-/

-- 
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@smurf.noris.de