Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Hi, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> especially given the requirement that you need <= 2 buildds.
I consider that requirement to be not warranted, and indeed unjustified.
If I had to think of a rationale for it, the only one I could think of
would be "the architecture needs to be fast enough not to block security
updates".
However, I consider an update whose $ARCH binaries are released a week
later not to be a problem.
Not when the alternate choice is to not have Debian support $ARCH at all.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Reply to: