debian-devel Mar 2005 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 5 of 6

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mar 19

Re: iyonix [was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting] Steve McIntyre
Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code] Gunnar Wolf
Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Gunnar Wolf
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Roberto C. Sanchez
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Marco d'Itri
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Anthony Towns
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Anthony Towns
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Gunnar Wolf
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Steve Langasek
Re: Required firewall support Gunnar Wolf
Re: Required firewall support Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Matthew Garrett
Re: iyonix [was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting] Matthew Garrett
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Gunnar Wolf
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Rich Rudnick
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Matthew Garrett
Bug#300341: ITP: 855resolution -- resolution modify tool for Intel graphic chipset Kenshi Muto
Re: OASIS -- Our Membership and their IP Policy? Michael Smith
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Steve Langasek
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Steve Langasek
Re: Accepted valknut 0.3.7-1 (i386 source) Pasi Savilaakso
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Karsten Merker
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Karsten Merker
Re: Debian DPL Debate Comments Adrian von Bidder
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Andrew M.A. Cater
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Re: Accepted valknut 0.3.7-1 (i386 source) Steve Langasek
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Bill Allombert
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Reinhard Tartler
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Marco d'Itri
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Steve Langasek
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) David Weinehall
Re: Accepted valknut 0.3.7-1 (i386 source) Matthias Urlichs
Re: Release sarge now, or discuss etch issues? (was: Bits (Nybbles?)from the Vancouver release team meeting) Gunnar Wolf
Re: procmail and Large File Support Gunnar Wolf
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Matthias Urlichs
Re: Required firewall support Matthias Urlichs
Re: Relaxing testing requirements (was: summarising answers toVancouver critique) Gunnar Wolf
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Gunnar Wolf
Bug#300409: ITP: gruler -- a customizable screen ruler for GNOME Maykel Moya
Bug#300406: ITP: ruby-zoom -- Ruby ZOOM API for the Z39.50 book information retrieval protocol Dafydd Harries
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Daniel Kobras
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Marco d'Itri
Security work in Debian (Was: Relaxing testing requirements) Petter Reinholdtsen
orphaning packages Sergio Rua
where to look to understand the big picture (was: Question for candidate Towns) martin f krafft
Re: orphaning packages Laszlo Boszormenyi
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Henning Makholm
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Henning Makholm
Re: automake/autoconf in build-dependencies Henning Makholm
Re: procmail and Large File Support Henning Makholm
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Henning Makholm
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Thiemo Seufer
Bug#300455: ITP: gwp -- GNOME War Pad (GWP) is a 'VGA Planets' strategy game client for GNOME. Lucas Di Pentima
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Adrian Bunk
Re: procmail and Large File Support Ron Johnson
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Steve Langasek
Re: Security work in Debian (Was: Relaxing testing requirements) Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Mar 20

Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Matthias Urlichs
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Matthias Urlichs
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Darren Salt
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Steve Langasek
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Henning Makholm
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Anthony Towns
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Andreas Rottmann
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Paul Hampson
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Anthony Towns
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Accepted valknut 0.3.7-1 (i386 source) Pasi Savilaakso
Re: Accepted valknut 0.3.7-1 (i386 source) Pasi Savilaakso
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Steve Langasek
Re: Accepted valknut 0.3.7-1 (i386 source) Martin Zobel-Helas
Re: dropping lpr-ppd from sarge Steve Langasek
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Christian Perrier
mess in BTS Andrea Mennucc
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Sven Luther
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Sven Luther
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Matthias Urlichs
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Matthias Urlichs
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: NEW handling ... Sven Luther
Re: NEW handling ... Sven Luther
Re: NEW handling ... Sven Luther
Re: [Proposal] $arch release assistants Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Sven Luther
Re: automake/autoconf in build-dependencies Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: orphaning packages Sven Luther
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Petter Reinholdtsen
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Thiemo Seufer
debian development diagram: major rework! Kevin Mark
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Matthew Garrett
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Daniel Stone
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Matthew Garrett
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Andreas Barth
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Hamish Moffatt
Re: [Proposal] $arch release assistants Andreas Barth
Re: mess in BTS Josh Metzler
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Matthew Palmer
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Thomas Viehmann
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Andreas Barth
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Andreas Barth
How to pin certain packages from experimental? Marc Haber
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Andreas Barth
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Andreas Barth
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Andreas Barth
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Sven Luther
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
Bug#300595: ITP: adesklets -- interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Andreas Barth
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Thomas Viehmann
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Brad Sims
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Sven Luther
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Raphael Hertzog
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Anthony Towns
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Darren Salt
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Adeodato Simó
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Sven Luther
Bug#300578: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- Mozilla Firefox Arabic Language/Region Package Torsten Werner
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Ben Collins
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#300595: ITP: adesklets -- interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system Michal Politowski
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Petter Reinholdtsen
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: NEW handling ... David Schmitt
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Andreas Metzler
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Marc Haber
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting David Nusinow
Re: Required firewall support Steve Greenland
Re: NEW handling ... Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Marco d'Itri
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Bernd Eckenfels
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Adrian Bunk
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Bill Gatliff
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: [Debian-ppc64-devel] Call For Help - Please support the ppc64 architecture Tollef Fog Heen
Re: NEW handling ... Steve Langasek
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Julien BLACHE
Re: NEW handling ... Joerg Jaspert
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: NEW handling ... Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Wouter Verhelst
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Wouter Verhelst
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Don Armstrong

Mar 21

Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Ben Collins
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Stephen Frost
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Darren Salt
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Anthony Towns
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Riku Voipio
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Stephen Frost
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Steve Langasek
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting David Nusinow
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Stephen Frost
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Stephen Frost
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Stephen Frost
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Hamish Moffatt
Re: NEW handling ... Kyle McMartin
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Ubuntu Patches Scott James Remnant
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Marc Haber
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Anthony Towns
Re: NEW handling ... Sven Luther
Re: NEW handling ... Sven Luther
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Adeodato Simó
NEWS.Debian abuse Jesus Climent
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Steve Langasek
Re: NEW handling ... Anthony Towns
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Christian Perrier
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Anthony Towns
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Tapio Lehtonen
Re: NEWS.Debian abuse Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) foo_bar_baz_boo-deb
ubuntu! Kevin Mark
Re: NEWS.Debian abuse Marco d'Itri
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Marc Haber
Re: NEWS.Debian abuse Jesus Climent
Re: Logs from the DPL debate posted, and a draft ballot Helen Faulkner
Re: Ubuntu Patches Thomas Hood
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Steve Langasek
Re: Ubuntu Patches Marco d'Itri
Re: NEW handling ... Matthias Urlichs
Re: Ubuntu Patches Colin Watson
Re: NEW handling ... David Schmitt
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Stephen Frost
Re: mess in BTS Kevin B. McCarty
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Wouter Verhelst
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Andreas Barth
NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: Required firewall support Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Sven Luther
Re: Required firewall support Sebastian Ley
Re: Ubuntu Patches Norbert Tretkowski
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Matthias Urlichs
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental? Paul Hampson
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Wouter Verhelst
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Andreas Barth
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Sven Luther
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Bill Allombert
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Sven Luther
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Andreas Barth
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Wouter Verhelst
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling ... Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Petter Reinholdtsen
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Sven Luther
Re: NEW handling ... Tollef Fog Heen
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Sven Luther
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Wouter Verhelst
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Ben Collins
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Ben Collins
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Matthew Wilcox
Re: Required firewall support David Weinehall
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Matthew Wilcox
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thiemo Seufer
Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code] Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Petter Reinholdtsen
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Anthony Towns
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Christian Perrier
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Matthew Wilcox
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Petter Reinholdtsen
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Christian Perrier
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: Ubuntu Patches Colin Watson
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Sven Luther
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Sven Luther
Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Matthew Garrett
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Wouter Verhelst
How to define a release architecture Matthew Garrett
Re: How to define a release architecture Falk Hueffner
Re: Required firewall support Joel Aelwyn
Re: procmail and Large File Support Ola Lundqvist
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Andreas Barth
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Sven Luther
Re: How to define a release architecture Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: Required firewall support Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Andreas Barth
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Torsten Landschoff
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Andreas Barth
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Wouter Verhelst
Re: How to define a release architecture Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mike Fedyk
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Tollef Fog Heen
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Julien BLACHE
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Michael K. Edwards
Re: How to define a release architecture Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: How to define a release architecture Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Adrian Bunk
Re: Release sarge now, or discuss etch issues? (was: Bits (Nybbles?)from the Vancouver release team meeting) Ola Lundqvist

Mar 22

Re: Ubuntu Patches Roger Leigh
Two thougts about testing Joerg Friedrich
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Steve Langasek
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Goswin von Brederlow
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mike Fedyk
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Tollef Fog Heen
Re: How to define a release architecture Steve Langasek
Re: How to define a release architecture Matthew Garrett
Re: Ubuntu Patches Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: NEW handling ... Kyle McMartin
Re: Two thougts about testing Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: Ubuntu Patches Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: Ubuntu Patches Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Ubuntu Patches Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Mike Fedyk
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Hamish Moffatt
Re: Ubuntu Patches Andres Salomon
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: Ubuntu Patches Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Quanah Gibson-Mount
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Hamish Moffatt
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Hamish Moffatt
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Steve Langasek
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Re: Ubuntu Patches Henning Makholm
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: Ubuntu Patches Andreas Tille
Re: Ubuntu Patches Alexandre
Re: Ubuntu Patches Matt Zimmerman
Re: How to define a release architecture Sven Luther
Bug#300828: ITP: gff2aplot -- pair-wise alignment-plots for genomic sequences in PostScript Nelson A. de Oliveira
Re: status of buildds? Paul Hedderly
Re: status of buildds? Steve Langasek
Re: How to define a release architecture Benjamin Mesing
Re: How to define a release architecture Sven Luther
Re: How to define a release architecture Falk Hueffner
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Frank Küster
Re: How to define a release architecture Steve Langasek
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Sven Luther
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Sven Luther
Re: Two thougts about testing Erik Schanze
How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) David Schmitt
Re: How to define a release architecture Adrian Bunk
packaging vmwaredsp-1.1 Marcos Pinto
Re: How to define a release architecture Alastair McKinstry
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Sven Luther
Re: How to define a release architecture Adrian Bunk
Re: packaging vmwaredsp-1.1 steinm
Re: How to define a release architecture Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Steve Langasek
Re: Ubuntu Patches Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Re: How to define a release architecture Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Re: How to define a release architecture Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Steve Langasek
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Matthew Garrett
Re: How to define a release architecture Adrian Bunk
Re: How to define a release architecture Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Humberto Massa
Re: How to define a release architecture Wouter Verhelst
Re: Ubuntu Patches Colin Watson
Re: How to define a release architecture Andreas Barth
Re: How to define a release architecture Wouter Verhelst
Re: How to define a release architecture Andreas Barth
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Michael K. Edwards
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Steve Langasek
Re: How to show $arch releaseability Simon Richter
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Wouter Verhelst
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Michael K. Edwards
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Goswin von Brederlow
Re: How to show $arch releaseability Thiemo Seufer
Re: How to define a release architecture Steve Langasek
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Wouter Verhelst
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Wouter Verhelst
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Tollef Fog Heen
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Michael K. Edwards
Re: How to show $arch releaseability Michael K. Edwards
More DDTP problems danielmb
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Adrian Bunk
Re: How to define a release architecture Wouter Verhelst
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Wouter Verhelst
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Matthew Wilcox
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Hamish Moffatt
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Wouter Verhelst
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Ben Collins
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Bernhard R. Link
blog location changed (who can change it on planet.d.o?) Arnaud Vandyck
Re: blog location changed (who can change it on planet.d.o?) Isaac Clerencia
Re: blog location changed (who can change it on planet.d.o?) Andreas Barth
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Michael K. Edwards
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting David Nusinow
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Rich Walker
Re: Re: How to show $arch releaseability luna
HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Alexander Schmehl
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Julien BLACHE
Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Frans Pop
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Raphael Hertzog
Re: Documentation is/is not software [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels] Matthew Palmer
Quick attempt to fix it Pierre THIERRY
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Sven Luther
Re: blog location changed (who can change it on planet.d.o?) Arnaud Vandyck
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Mike Fedyk

Mar 23

Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Adrian Bunk
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Steve Langasek
Re: Ubuntu Patches Henning Makholm
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Adrian Bunk
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Pierre THIERRY
discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Karl Chen
Bug#300986: ITP: libfax-hylafax-client-perl -- Fax::Hylafax::Client from CPAN - Perl client for HylaFAX fax server Ivan Kohler
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Steve Langasek
Re: Bug#299771: ITP: ttf-antp -- Antykwa Poltawskiego font family Miles Bader
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Glenn Maynard
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Ingo Juergensmann
Re: Quick attempt to fix it Martin Waitz
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Ognyan Kulev
Bug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Composer engine Nick Price
Bug#300996: ITP: clamassassin -- clamassassin is a simple virus filter wrapper for camav for use in procmail filters and similar applications. Nick Price
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Frank Küster
Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Kevin Mark
Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Alexander Schmehl
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Christoph Hellwig
Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Nico Golde
Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments) Nico Golde
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Humberto Massa
Re: Bug#300996: ITP: clamassassin -- simple wrapper for clamav Santiago Vila
Re: Documentation is/is not software [was: NEW ...] Humberto Massa
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Erik Schanze
Found an http SourceForge archive mirror Free Ekanayaka
Re: Found an http SourceForge archive mirror Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Aurélien GÉRÔME
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Anthony Towns
Bug#301041: apt-cache: dependency graph for build dependencies Stefano Zacchiroli
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Wouter Verhelst
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Theodore Ts'o
Re: querying available package versions over the net Roderick Schertler
Re: Bug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Composer engine Mike Hommey
Re: Bug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Composer engine Mike Hommey
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Bill Allombert
Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Elimar Riesebieter
Bug#301083: ITP: libevolution-ruby -- revolution, ruby binding for the evolution mail client David Moreno Garza
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Karl Chen
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Karl Chen
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Bug#301061: ITP: apt-rpm -- tools to create APT RPM repository Peter Eisentraut
Re: debian development diagram: major rework! Josselin Mouette
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Adrian Bunk
NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master Joerg Jaspert
Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Per Olofsson
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Petri Latvala
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Russell Coker

Mar 24

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels] Matthew Palmer
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Bug#301142: ITP: libgraphviz-perl -- Perl interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Dominic Hargreaves
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Karl Chen
Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master Josh Metzler
Re: Bug#299783: ITP: python-enchant -- A spellchecking library forPython Ryan Kelly
Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb Karl Chen
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Paul Hampson
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Pierre THIERRY
Debian-Installer rc3 released Joey Hess
wxWidgets 2.5 [Was Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master] Steve Langasek
Re: Debian-Installer rc3 released Jesus Climent
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Jesus Climent
Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels] Marc Haber
sliced bread (was: Debian-Installer rc3 released) Frank Küster
Re: sliced bread (was: Debian-Installer rc3 released) Ben Hill
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Paul Hampson
Possible compromise on releasing architectures Blars Blarson
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Anthony Towns
Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels] Matthew Palmer
Re: debian development diagram: major rework! Kevin Mark
Re: Possible compromise on releasing architectures Blars Blarson
Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Andreas Barth
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt David Schmitt
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Bernhard R. Link
Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels] Thomas Hood
Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Guido Guenther
Processed: Re: fonts, entiity and konqueror/qt Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Norbert Tretkowski
Re: Possible compromise on releasing architectures Jan Niehusmann
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Jesus Climent
Re: Two thougts about testing Steve Langasek
Development files for manipulating Debian packages Ivan Kirchev
Re: Found an http SourceForge archive mirror Free Ekanayaka
Re: Two thougts about testing Thiemo Seufer
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Hamish Moffatt
Getting openswan 2.2.0 back into sarge Rene Mayrhofer
Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo Paul Hedderly
Re: Bug#295131: JFTR: sdl(glib2.0) vs. wx2.4(glib1.2) only affects scorched3d Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Re: Bug#295131: JFTR: sdl(glib2.0) vs. wx2.4(glib1.2) only affects scorched3d David Schmitt
Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt Adeodato Simó
Re: Debian-Installer rc3 released Otavio Salvador
Packages count (was Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Pierre THIERRY
Re: Bug#295131: JFTR: sdl(glib2.0) vs. wx2.4(glib1.2) only affects scorched3d Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Re: Bug#295131: JFTR: sdl(glib2.0) vs. wx2.4(glib1.2) only affects scorched3d Josselin Mouette

The last update was on 11:30 GMT Wed Jun 05. There are 2833 messages. Page 5 of 6.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 5 of 6

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc