Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:46:37PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > There are small KDE applications that require most of the KDE dependency
> > chain to be installed, while on the other hand XFree86's build
> > dependency list is (relatively) small.
>
> would it make sense to examine the queue to see if any packages have
> similar build dependencies and then move them to the top of the queue so
> they build immediately after the current one?
> or to re-sequence the queue to group package with similar build
> dependencies.
That wouldn't necessary help; not all architectures (especially not the
slower ones) build all packages on the same host.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- From: Kevin Mark <kmark+debian-devel@pipeline.com>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
- Next by Date:
Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- Previous by thread:
Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- Next by thread:
Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
- Index(es):