On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:24:18AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Great work! I am glad to see you got down with dia; I love that > tool. Here are some comments: Its cool that it exports to xfig as a way to use both tools. > > a. I am not sure what the "process realm" is. ACK. renamed it. > b. Developers do not tag bugs, they sign packages. Is that what you > meant? Also, note that at the moment, most only sign source > packages and binary uploads, not the binary packages themselves. NACK. you lost me. this is a gap in my knowlege. differentiate source package, binary upload, and binary package. where do they go? what do developers do? who creates source package, binary uploads and binary pacakges? > c. Upstream is not really a repository, is it? ACK. changed it. > d. I am missing the link between buildd and unstable. They get the > orig.tar.gz from unstable for any uploads in incoming that do > not include the tarball. > e. I think it's "M. Schulze", not Shultze. ACK. > f. Sven's name has an Umlaut; here, to cut-n-paste: Müller ACK. I still dont know how to fiddle with keymaps, input methods or such things to get these! > g. "users processes" should be "users' processes", though I think > you may want to use another word. Like plain "users" or "user > systems" may be better. ACK. > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to > testing. ACK. I'm not familar with all possibilities and also not sure how much space it would take to include it. maybe a 'subprocess' box? > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control) > without making it clear which one is meant. NACK. I only used this word once in referense to high, medium, low migration of packages from unstable to testing. > j. "updates propagate", not "updates propagates". I know you are > talking about the collection, but it sounds weird. ACK. > > That's it for now. > > To get our graphs onto www.debian.org, I assume we file bugs against > that pseudo-package. there is an existing package that could include these? or to make an ITP? Someone in the 'eyecatcher' project said these may be helpful. > Let me know when you are ready, then we can > submit one bug report together. > Cool! Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
Description: Digital signature