Le dimanche 23 janvier 2005 à 02:56 +0000, Matthew Garrett a écrit : > Your package doesn't depend on Linux 2.6. Your package depends on NPTL. > The only NPTL implementation Debian provides is in Linux 2.6, but users > may have built their own 2.4 kernel with NPTL patches. You should depend > on what you actually require, and if the package management system > doesn't allow you to express that dependency you should document it > instead. This is just insane. What if we removed all dependencies on mail-transport-agent, just because the user can install a random MTA by himself ? Why not remove all dependencies, while we're at it? The user may have built his own versions of all software. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=