* [ 19-01-05 - 15:57 ] Rudy Godoy <rudy@kernel-panik.org> wrote: > El d?a 18/01/2005 a 12:53 Emanuele Rocca escribio ... > > > WNPP bugs for some of the -goodies need to be retitled from O: to ITP:. > > They wouldn't be ITA? Indeed. > > I found the time to check -battery-plugin and -clipman-plugin, and I > > must admit that they're not in a good shape (ITP bugs not closed in the > > changelog, bugs marked as fixed are actually still reproducible, lintian > > is not happy)... > > I don't see any ITP bugs on those both. s/ITP/ITA/ #245114 and #245115, against WNPP. > > Why is the Debian Xfce Packages Alioth project dead? [0] > > IMHO putting these packages under collaborative maintenance would be a > > better idea. > > Yes, I agree on this. In fact I remember asking for some "review" from > other Xfce maintainers before upload/ask for sponsorship. Andrew Law kindly added us to the Alioth project, we can start working there; I also asked him to create a public mailing list. ciao, ema
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature