Re: LVM packages up for adoption
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:11:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> My recommendation would be an LVM alioth project, w/ a svn or arch
> (preferred) repository. I've kept track of lvm2 stuff in arch for a
> number of years, it has worked well.
>
> Patrick, it might even be worth all 4 of us maintaining all the LVM
> related packages (throwing lvm10 in with the rest), since Tim uses
> multipath-tools, and none of us care much for lvm10.
>
That sounds like a good plan.
--
patrick
Reply to: