Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
On Monday 27 December 2004 17:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield:
> >> Quite a number of licensees disagree with your assessment of the
> >> situation, and I'm sure at least some of them have paid actual patent
> >> lawyers.
> >
> > I'm sure those lawyers didn't talk to you. You're parrotting the
> > output of the marketing departments of the patent holders, which may
> > (but probably does not) match what the lawyers think.
>
> It's been documented publicly that the patent holders have been able
> to extort at least some money. But I'm sure you'll claim that all
> news stories about the patents, including the victims' statements,
> have been faked, so there's no point in arguing with you further.
Just because a sucker somewhere have been frauded doesn't mean it would have
held in court. We should not, and can not stay clear of everything suckers
have been fooled into believing is legimate.
`Allan
Reply to: