[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?



On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield:
> 
> >> You deleted the part about the patent on a transmission system
> >> involving compression.  The relevant European patents are EP 0400755,
> >> EP 0402973, EP 0599824 and EP 0660540.
> >
> > That's the usual mindless fluff patent, which applies to just about
> > everything, like the (now expired) patent on linked lists. We ignore
> > them unless we have reason not to, because otherwise we'd never get
> > anything done.
> >
> > Still not a patent on decoding.
> 
> Quite a number of licensees disagree with your assessment of the
> situation, and I'm sure at least some of them have paid actual patent
> lawyers.

I'm sure those lawyers didn't talk to you. You're parrotting the
output of the marketing departments of the patent holders, which may
(but probably does not) match what the lawyers think.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: