Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
From: james <james@westcoastbmx.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:04:22 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 1104116662.11134.2.camel@localhost>

Why can't lame be packaged in the non-free section?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
  - From: William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net>

Prev by Date: Re: LCC and blobs
Next by Date: Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#287317: ITP: eid -- software to support the eID, the new Belgian electronical ID card
Next by thread: Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread