[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: [volatile] status update
To
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: [volatile] status update
From
: Sam Watkins <
swatkins@fastmail.fm
>
Date
: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:18:34 +1100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
20041223231834.GC2559@bart.local
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
20041224045208.GC17714@keitarou.bubblesworth.net
>
References
: <
[🔎]
20041223160528.GB24547@mails.so.argh.org
> <
[🔎]
20041223173431.GC15202@bignachos.com
> <
[🔎]
20041223200750.GI24547@mails.so.argh.org
> <
[🔎]
20041223202003.GE15202@bignachos.com
> <
[🔎]
20041224045208.GC17714@keitarou.bubblesworth.net
>
Of all the suggestions, I think "volatile" is by far the best so far!
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sam Watkins (on-list)
Sam Watkins (off-list)
References
:
[volatile] status update
From:
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Re: [volatile] status update
From:
Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
Re: [volatile] status update
From:
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Re: [volatile] status update
From:
Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
Re: [volatile] status update
From:
Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au (Paul Hampson)
Prev by Date:
Re: [volatile] status update
Next by Date:
Re: LCC and blobs
Previous by thread:
Re: [volatile] status update
Next by thread:
Re: [volatile] status update
Index(es):
Date
Thread