Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > It's nice to have one, when it's ready and working, but making a unfinished work in > progress mandatory for a release seems pretty wrong to me. The reason we've released two d-i "release candidates" is because d-i is ready for release. > Yes. Some older machines tend to have small amounts of RAM. Some even has no > 32 MB, so testing d-i on those archs seem to be pretty impossible. d-i supports installing on machines with 20 mb of ram on i386. Other architectures have even smaller requirements. > Why do you ignore the truth? Pot. Kettle. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature