On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:59:10PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > The main technical effect that I see would be that the names of some > dynamic libraries would change. And compatibility with the old names > could be maintained indefinitely if necessary. How in the world does changing the names of core system libraries serve the technical goal of providing better *compatibility* between distros? Indeed, how could this be anything other than a gratuitous change? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature