Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 07:42, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
wrote:
> > > Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered
> > > to be appealing to prurient interests. Unless, *maybe*, a hyper-
> > > horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and
> > > not in the context of some "scientific value", i.e., a text book.
> > > Even in that case, though, the boy would probably be told to wash
> > > his hand and stop being a pervert.
> >
> > So you have no objections to bestiality web sites then?
>
> How does "a picture of dogs copulating" get morphed into "bestiality"?
When such pictures appear on porn sites they are presumably used in the same
manner as other porn (not for scientific or artistic purposes).
I haven't actually seen a picture of two dogs copulating on a bestiality site
(when it was my job to kill such sites I just looked at the front page which
was usually enough to determine whether it met the non-commercial criteria).
I have seen pictures of dogs genitals on bestiality sites that were not in
any way connected to humans.
> Are you are purposefully misinterpreting what I wrote?
When you give an example of a boy needing to "wash his hands" after "seeing a
picture of dogs copulating" you are obviously referring to dog-copulation
porn pictures. I was interpreting it in EXACTLY the same way as you.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: