Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:22, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:01 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > So are you saying I should take my web pages of my naked dogs down?
>
> Depends on who's prurient interests are appealed to by your naked
> dogs.
>
> Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered
> to be appealing to prurient interests. Unless, *maybe*, a hyper-
> horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and
> not in the context of some "scientific value", i.e., a text book.
> Even in that case, though, the boy would probably be told to wash
> his hand and stop being a pervert.
So you have no objections to bestiality web sites then?
Some years ago a server in Amsterdam that I was running was overloaded due to
thousands of downloads per hour of a bestiality AVI. I removed the site due
to technical reasons (the entire ISP ran slow because of all the bestiality
downloads).
The same server had the same problem with pictures of Britney Spears, should I
have removed the Britney pictures because they were obscene (no prises for
guessing what they were used for) but left the animal sex pictures?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: