On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 23:40 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:11:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: [snip] > Well, I've changed my mind actually. An optional package called > 'hot-babe' is pretty harmless. The images are hardly pornography, > though I certainly couldn't run it on my office PC (unless I was > trying to get fired). Why would you get fired for displaying "hardly pornographic" images on your PC? Oh, yeah, that's right: sexual harassment, uncomfortable workplace, fear of lawsuits, blah, blah. Thanks, Hamish, for helping to make our point. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "The man who has gotten everything he wants is all in favor of peace and order." Jawaharlal Nehru
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part