Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:
> Well, except for..
I'm sorry, I didn't mean that these other possibilities don't exist.
Bruce was not suggesting any of them either, and my real point is that
none of them are on-topic for debian-devel.
> 6. project decides informally that potential legal liabilities outweigh
> the benefit of putting some software in Debian, applies this on a
> slightly ad-hoc basis (certian possibly-patent-infringing software, but
> hardly all of it)
I don't know what in practice this amounts to, except the ftp-masters
or the DPL enforcing it, which reduces to the previous things.
> 7. content of package referred to tech committee, who overrule the
> maintainer[2]
tech-ctte has no jurisdiction over non-technical matters.
Reply to: