[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:24:19AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 22:08 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> > 
> > > A legal opinion on this matter would be a good idea...
> > 
> > Keep in mind that Debian is not the U in question; Debian has no
> > obligation to conform to some U's self-censorship policies.
> 
> That's true.  Debian doesn't *have* to be mirrored *anywhere*.
> 
Hi all.
if someone in $VERY_RESTRICTED_COUNTRY downloads it from $FREE_COUNTRY,
is debian still liable?
If this is the case, then any 'problem' packages can not be in anyway
associated with debian.
- -kev


- -- 
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!

        (__)
        (oo)
  /------\/
 / |    ||
*  /\---/\
   ~~   ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBtASGRp+kG4Nu//URArrcAJ4wyPn6OkQ3g5s4ZFWFIxSDz5LKkwCdE7K1
b1FtwmcqAj9Zo20CBfPn21s=
=p130
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: