Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:32:29 -0600, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> said:
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 19:24 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
>>
>> > There's a *fundamental* difference between "don't want hot-babe
>> > in Debian" and "don't want hot-babe to *exist*".
>>
>> Currently, the procedures for the inclusion of packages in Debian
>> allow each developer to decide what to package, provided the
>> licenses permit distribution.
> Yes, I know. AFAICT, the only way for h-b to not be in Debian would
> be if Thibaut VARENE, who filed the original ITP, decided not to
> submit the package to Debian.
That shall not work, since if the ITP is not followed upon,
other people may chose to put the package in Debian. ITP's can be
hijacked if the original author does not follow through.
manoj
--
NEWARK has been REZONED!! DES MOINES has been REZONED!!
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: