Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.

To: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 05 Dec 2004 22:08:48 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87fz2kyn4f.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1102312984.15074.85.camel@haggis.homelan>
References: <[🔎] 1101997482.4457.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20041202144745.GG8844@excelhustler.com> <[🔎] 20041202145412.GG10437@ns.snowman.net> <[🔎] 87r7m84qdu.fsf@whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org> <[🔎] 20041203111949.GA9525@galaxy> <[🔎] 41B0E4C3.9070101@minimum.se> <[🔎] 20041204234125.GH27718@khan.acc.umu.se> <[🔎] 41B256C7.5000401@perens.com> <[🔎] 20041205103047.GA5240@galactic.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 41B3B2C6.2070601@perens.com> <[🔎] 20041206014552.GG2799@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] 41B3E7BC.9000805@perens.com> <[🔎] 87oeh810ds.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 41B3F025.2040100@perens.com> <[🔎] 874qj00ypu.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 1102312984.15074.85.camel@haggis.homelan>

Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:

> A legal opinion on this matter would be a good idea...

Keep in mind that Debian is not the U in question; Debian has no
obligation to conform to some U's self-censorship policies.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

References:
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
  - From: Fernanda Giroleti Weiden <fernanda@softwarelivre.org>
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
  - From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
  - From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
  - From: lenaerts.frank@pandora.be (Frank Lenaerts)
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian
  - From: Martin Olsson <mnemo@minimum.se>
- Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian
  - From: David Weinehall <tao@debian.org>
- Questionable image process. Was: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
- Re: Questionable image process. Was: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian
  - From: amacater@galactic.demon.co.uk (Andrew M.A. Cater)
- Re: Questionable image process. Was: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
- Re: Questionable image process. Was: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
- Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
- Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
Next by Date: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
Previous by thread: Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
Next by thread: Re: Debian's status as a legal entity and how it could effect a potential defense.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread