On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 21:42 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> writes: > > > 8. Obscenity and Harassment: GW computing systems and services may > > not be used in an obscene, harassing or otherwise improper manner. > > GW computing systems and services shall not be used in a manner that > > discriminates against another individual on any basis protected by > > federal or local law. This provision explicitly prohibits any > > behavior that is intended to or has the effect of creating an > > intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment because of an > > individual's sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, > > pregnancy, sexual orientation, disability, or other factors > > protected by law. > > And you have evidence that the inclusion of such an image in a bulk > archive, which is present in a merely passive manner, runs afoul of > this provision? > > It seems to me that a hostile workplace is not created by the presence > of an archive or a single image in that archive. > > But if you have a legal opinion to offer on this question, I would be > glad to hear it. A legal opinion on this matter would be a good idea... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "It's springtime for Hitler, and Germany..."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part