[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor



On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:20:32 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> said: 

> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:11:56PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:17:05 +1100, Brian May <bam@debian.org>
>> said:
>> > My point was for somebody thinking along the lines: "I want to
>> > distribute Debian to this target audience but I don't want to
>> > risk upsetting anybody or risk getting arrested and I don't want
>> > to have to do it in secret".  -- Brian May <bam@debian.org>
>> 
>> Well, remember to exclude the Linux kernel, then. It is certainly
>> not minor friendly.

> Consider intent. The linux kernel source code intends to be (a)
> compilable and also useful as

	Hot babe is also intrended to be useful, and display CPU
 load. The intent is systems monitoring.

> (b) educational. As a side-effect, it contains swearing.

	As a side effect, hot-babe contains Bruno Bellamy art.

> hot-babe exists only to display images, presently of naked women.
> Hence the name.

	You have no clue what you are discussion. The primnary intent
 is CPU monitoring, the side effect is to display Bruno Bellamy artwork.

	manoj
-- 
You had mail.  Paul read it, so ask him what it said.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: