Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:38, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:
> > Hmm. I would like some Raphael budes, yes. and some studies by
> > michelangelo too. Oh, you think that is not porn?
>
> I think calling the hot-babe package and images 'art' is a bit
> farfetched.
Do you consider pictures by the same artist of characters that have more
clothing to be art?
If so do you believe that less clothing makes art suddenly cease being art?
Why can't art be pornographic and porn be artistic anyway?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: