Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

[Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>]

On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 09:27, David Weinehall wrote:

> > So far so sarcastic. IMO if it can be demonstrated that distributing
> > something is illegal we should think about not distributing it.
>
> And, as demonstrated elsewhere in the thread, whoops goes
> bible-kjv-text.

I know of no country where that is illegal. If someone can name one with 
evidence then we may consider it.

I don't see how that package is integral to Debian anyway.

> > We are not the EFF. If they or anyone else wants to fight for the
>
> No, we're not.  We're also not the PTA or the moral police.

I never suggested we were. We should however make sure we try to protect as 
many of our users, developers and distributors as we can wherever in the 
world they may live.

> > right to look at cartoon tits then that's fine by me. We are trying to
> > build an operating system. I think.
>
> Indeed.  From that point of view, hotbabe is pretty meaningless.
> Then again, so is quake, doom, nethack, etc.

Please do not compare apples and oranges. No-one (other than Manoj making 
vague insinuations) has suggested any of those may be illegal to distribute.