[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor



On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 04:57 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:36:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:54 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:57:56PM +0100, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:17:37PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > > However, I'd be *highly* agitated if someone gave my daughter a 
> > > > > CD-ROM with *any* nudy cartoons.
> > > > 
> > > > I'd rather live with this risk than with less freedom.
> > > 
> > > only in a free society can we have this debate. If there exists
> > > societies that limit peoples freedom, why should we strive to limit
> > > peoples freedom. If the Debian project contains things are forbidden 
> > > in other societies because they are less free, then we should be the
> > > example.
> > 
> > Yes, but Debian can't be an example to them if they don't have
> > it in the 1st place.
> > 
> Hi Ron,
> 
> I have no objection to yet another CDD ...
> debian-buddist,debian-islamic,... All someone has to do is create the
> appropriate meta-package or jigdo text. Something like this would take
> little effort by the folks involved.

That's a very good idea.

(I thought Buddhism was very every-path-is-the-right-path-blah-blah.
What could they want restricted?)

> kind of remnds me of something I heard about walmart on PBS. They have
> 'clean' versions of pop music created for their monoply^H^H^H^H^HStores.

PBS or CNBC?  I saw a documentary on CNBC a few weeks ago about
them.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

The difference between drunken sailors and Congressmen is that
drunken sailors spend their own money.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: