Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:54:12AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > If our goal is to advance the cause of a Free operating system, then why
> > should we be including, in our OPERATING SYSTEM, images that serve no
> > useful purpose, and instead alienate millions or billions of people
>
> I agree with this and is why I was suggesting that someone draft up some
> language which outlines, for the benefit of our users, things they're
> not likely to find in Debian. I suppose that might end up being too
> difficult but I think it'd be good to have some criteria for packages to
> pass in order to be accepted which includes issues like these and is
> clear enough that our users understand it.
Indeed, and this is also why Manoj's vi/KDE argument is not relevant.
vi serves a useful purpose for an operating system.
Porn/nudes/whatever don't.
-- John
Reply to: