Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:47:47 +0000, Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> said:
> On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 22:15, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> Anybody who can't obtain porn using only the tools provided on a
>> Debian CD is a total moron. You might as well complain that the
>> internet is bad, just because it's primarily used as a vehicle for
>> delivering porn.
> No. We are talking about "distributing" hot-babe. Debian never has
> and probably never will distribute "teh Intarnet". We cannot stop
> people doing anything with Debian that is within license terms once
> it is installed, but we can be held responsible for what we
> distribute.
Yup. We also distribute purity-ogg. fortunes-off, and the bible.
>> [And that's without even starting on this insane notion that trying
>> to stop kids from seeing porn is somehow a good idea]
> Debian should have no moral concern, but a legal one is valid IMO.
Right. There does not seem to be any indication that this
material, like pictures of Raphael's nudes, is illegal to distribute.
> A concern about filling the archive with crap is a different thing
> altogether...
Yup. need to get rid of vi.
manoj
--
A woman was in love with fourteen soldiers. It was clearly platoonic.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: