Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:06:18 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:30:24PM -0200, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> > Am 2004-12-01 13:16:11, schrieb Fernanda Giroleti Weiden:
>> > >
>> > > First of all, it's a sexist package, sure. Putting a program on
>> > > Debian in which you have pictures of nude women is VERY
>> > > agressive to the most women. Yes, it's agressive to me.
>> > And I was thinking, I am alone...
>> It's VERY oppressive to force hot-babe out of Debian because of
>> personal feelings about nudity. It's pure anti-speech insanity
>> leading the way to socialism.
> How about we leave it out because it's crap, then?
From all accounts, it seems to be a well done piece of
software -- just its choice of images is an issue.
> Why stop at cartoons? Once it's themable, we should ship some
> photographs too. And don't worry about the load monitoring, let's
> just ship some porn for the sake of it. Call it test data for
> pornview or something.
Hmm. I would like some Raphael budes, yes. and some studies by
michelangelo too. Oh, you think that is not porn?
If at first you don't succeed that is only to be expected--there is a
little bit of good even in the best of us. (No one is as good as he
thinks he is.)
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C