Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:17:19 +0000, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> said:
> Rather than argue about morality, legality, whatever, shouldn't we
> be considering this in other terms - simple usefulness? Instead of
> asking "why shouldn't this go into Debian?", ask "why _should_ this
> go into Debian?".
Great idea. I find cpu monitors useful. I find vi useless.
> We seem to have a growing and worrying trend to pick up any random
> free software and add it to the distribution without considering
> whether it's actually useful or not...
Yeah, should have nipped the whole vi clone family in the bud.
manoj
happy to demonstrate that preferences are a bad way to form an
inclusion policy
--
It's not whether you win or lose but how you played the
game. Grantland Rice
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: