Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:21:51 +1100
- Message-id: <[🔎] sa4u0r5n28g.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1101869198.20019.53.camel@localhost> (Joe Wreschnig's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:46:39 -0600")
- References: <E1CYuzu-0001fP-00@Tatooine.r3z0> <20041130143338.GA10337@excelhustler.com> <20041130145235.GA13059@nic.fr> <200411301934.57469.debian@carewolf.com> <1101845893.20019.29.camel@localhost> <20041130230636.GB3945@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1101869198.20019.53.camel@localhost>
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org> writes:
Joe> So what are we going to do with it? Ignoring it, as many here
Joe> seems to advocate, is pretty dumb. Bashing the USA for stupid
Joe> laws doesn't solve the problem. An "Adult" debtag category
Joe> might, but then do we demand (formal or informal) age
Joe> verification to download the "full" Debian CD? And if not,
Joe> what's the point of that tag? We'd just be distributing
Joe> *admitted* adult content to minors, then. -- Joe Wreschnig
Joe> <piman@debian.org>
If we did this, we would allow people to create CDs, if they desired,
without the offending software.
This would solve complaints along the lines of "I want to distribute
Debian without accidently upsetting parents by distributing Adult
software that is useless anyway...".
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: