Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org> [041130 09:08]:However, pornography causes significant legal problems in the US, and probably moreso in many other countries.I'm not sure, how »pornography« is defined in the US and I really didn't intend to join your nice discussion, but could you please keep in mind, that it just show rough pixely pictures of a drawn woman?
for more info on legal aspects of pornography check out wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography#Legal_situation
It would be more worth of a discussion, if the package should have "erotic" in it's description (my personal opinion would be: No).
I agree with you there.Even though, i think this whole issue has been dealt with a million times in this thread i must say this:
I think this is all about hypocrisy. I can say without a doubt that all women in this world have seen a naked woman. And i seriously doubt that there are many men out there that haven't seen a naked woman in some point of their lives.
But as for this issue, this can all be solved by replacing the babe in the images with a sheep, in the first pic it has all it's wool, the next it's partially sheared and finally fully sheared. (in case of overheating the image could change in to a roast)
I hope nobody objects to animal nudity. There, issue solved. -- Sami