On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:23:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:51:55PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> > I'm not sure, how »pornography« is defined in the US and I really didn't
> > intend to join your nice discussion, but could you please keep in mind,
> > that it just show rough pixely pictures of a drawn woman?
>
> The problem with pornography in the US is that it isn't defined. It's
> officially "I'll know it when I see it." Tread carefully.
>
> - David Nusinow
>
There is a case being defended by the EFF about a web site
featuring a professional fotographer who takes erotic photos. The test
is 'local community standards'. There are none for the i-net. And
anywheres cd are distrubued, each community has their own local
standards. SO how can the cd pass every community tests if we dont have
access to all those laws/standards/communities.
-Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature