Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files

To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Cc: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 18 Nov 2004 09:25:56 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u0rnqdaz.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041118154318.GB5759@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <[🔎] 87k6sks43y.fsf@sevenup.crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> <[🔎] 20041117195209.GB21541@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 87brdw2ay6.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20041118154318.GB5759@mails.so.argh.org>

Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:

> That still doesn't convert the opinion of most frequent writers on
> debian-legal that the GFDL doesn't meet the SC into a decision to remove
> all packages with GFDL from Debian.

Huh?  We *already* have a requirement that packages which don't meet
our licensing criteria should be removed.  

Thomas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

References:
- Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
  - From: sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (Brian M. Carlson)
- Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
Next by Date: Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
Previous by thread: Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
Next by thread: Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread