On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:54 +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:49 +0100, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:33:43PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > I'm wondering why I can't see many different 2.6 kernels on my Sarge > > > systems any longer. I own a Via C3-based computer (an x86 for those who > > > didn't know) and can find only -386 and -686 kernels which could > > > possibly match. > > > > > > Somebody knows? > > > > I would go for a 386 kernel, If I remember correctly my via paniced > > when I tried the 686 kernel. > Thanks, but honestly, I expected someone to say: "hey, where are all > those kernels gone?" like me ;-) > I'm already using -386, but Via C3 has MMX and other stuff like that > which could probably be useful for maximum performance. Roll your own kernel? But really, does the kernel use MMX? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B Why won't GWB have the US invade the DPRK? Because the People's Army has 11-15,000 cannons all aimed at Seoul...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part