Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?

To: "Thaddeus H. Black" <t@b-tk.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
From: Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:43:57 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 5fabd6fd04092406433ff41e0b@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040924003526.GA377@b-tk.org>
References: <[🔎] 5fabd6fd040923142342096b8b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20040924003526.GA377@b-tk.org>

Hi Thaddeus,

I know debtags and Enrico, but will debtags replace our current
subsections after sarge ? Was it discussed before? Are you needing
help?

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:35:26 +0000, Thaddeus H. Black <t@b-tk.org> wrote:
> Debian's muscular horde of binary packages
> overran the beleaguered archive subsection
> system years ago.  Help is on the way.  See
> debtags [1] and debram.
>
> [...] 
> 
> 1. http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/

Reply to:

References:
- Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
  - From: Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco@gmail.com>
- Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
  - From: "Thaddeus H. Black" <t@b-tk.org>

Prev by Date: Re: How should stalin be handled on slower architectures?
Next by Date: Re: Small problems with Sarge net-install
Previous by thread: Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
Next by thread: Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread