Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
From: "Thaddeus H. Black" <t@b-tk.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:35:26 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040924003526.GA377@b-tk.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5fabd6fd040923142342096b8b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 5fabd6fd040923142342096b8b@mail.gmail.com>

Debian's muscular horde of binary packages
overran the beleaguered archive subsection
system years ago.  Help is on the way.  See
debtags [1] and debram.

-- 
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, t@b-tk.org

1. http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/

Attachment: pgp7dw6cN3JqN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
  - From: Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco@gmail.com>

References:
- Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
  - From: Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die
Next by Date: Re: DUL-based filtering is burning your own bridges (was: Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die)
Previous by thread: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
Next by thread: Re: Do we need better documentation about our subsections?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread