Re: why couldn't we provide 'mppe-kernel-source' instead of 'kernel-patch-mppe'

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why couldn't we provide 'mppe-kernel-source' instead of 'kernel-patch-mppe'
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:15:46 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040920081546.GA12004@hezmatt.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1095663893.757146.165730@k17g2000odb.googlegroups.com>
References: <[🔎] 1095663893.757146.165730@k17g2000odb.googlegroups.com>

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:04:53AM -0700, Li Daobing wrote:
> I want to know why we don't provide 'mppe-kernel-source' instead of
> 'kernel-patch-mppe'. If so, I could only build the mppe module instead
> of build the whole kernel.

Why don't you ask the maintainer of the package in question, instead of all
of d-devel?

- Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- why couldn't we provide 'mppe-kernel-source' instead of 'kernel-patch-mppe'
  - From: "Li Daobing" <lidaobing@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: why couldn't we provide 'mppe-kernel-source' instead of 'kernel-patch-mppe'
Next by Date: hal Depends:
Previous by thread: why couldn't we provide 'mppe-kernel-source' instead of 'kernel-patch-mppe'
Next by thread: hal Depends:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread